Monday, 7:45 a.m., at a physiotherapy clinic in Pointe-Claire. The booking software won't open, and neither will the electronic records. On the front-desk PC, a note demands a ransom. Twelve patients are due before noon, and nobody can see who they are.
Health information is about as sensitive as data gets, and the sector is squarely in the crosshairs. According to the Canadian Centre for Cyber Security, ransomware incidents affecting healthcare have been steadily increasing worldwide, and they directly disrupt the ability to deliver care.
Many clinic owners still assume Law 25 is the only privacy law that applies to them. But since July 1, 2024, a sector-specific Quebec statute governs the health information held by private clinics, with very concrete security obligations. Here's what it means in practice.
TL;DR
- Since July 1, 2024, Quebec's Act respecting health and social services information governs health information held by private health facilities; Law 25 still applies to other personal information, such as employee files.
- The act requires a governance policy, logging mechanisms, a public register of the technology products you use and annual staff training, among other things.
- An incident that presents a risk of serious injury must be reported promptly to the Minister and to the Commission d'accès à l'information.
- Technical priorities: multi-factor authentication, named accounts, offline backups and isolating the PCs attached to medical devices.
Which law applies to your clinic?
The Act respecting health and social services information (CQLR, c. R-22.1) was passed in 2023. In French it's often called "loi 5," after its chapter number in the 2023 statutes. Most of its provisions have been in force since July 1, 2024.
It applies to "bodies in the health and social services sector." Beyond the public network, its Schedule II covers persons or groups operating a private health facility: a business where physicians, dentists or other professionals practise privately and on their own account, without providing lodging or specialized medical treatments. Specialized medical centres, laboratories and private seniors' residences are also listed.
For these bodies, Law 25 doesn't apply to the health and social services information they hold; the health information act takes over. But Law 25 still covers everything else.
| Type of information | Example | Applicable law, generally |
|---|---|---|
| Patient record | Clinical notes, results, treatment plan | Health information act |
| Information about services received | Appointments, billing for care | Health information act |
| Employee files collected for HR management | Payroll, evaluations, job applications | Law 25 |
| Business contacts | Suppliers, general newsletter prospects | Law 25 |
The line isn't always sharp, especially in multidisciplinary clinics. Confirm your situation with legal counsel.
What the health information act requires on security
The act and its Regulation respecting the governance of health and social services information turn security into specific duties. These are the ones that hit a private clinic most directly.
| Obligation | Source | In practice |
|---|---|---|
| Reasonable security measures given the sensitivity of the information | Act, s. 99 | MFA, encryption, backups, access control |
| Governance policy covering logging, security measures, an update schedule for technology products and incident handling | Act, s. 105 | A written document your team actually knows |
| Privacy impact assessment before acquiring, developing or overhauling a technology product | Act, s. 106 | New EMR, online booking, telehealth |
| Register of technology products and services, published on your website | Act, s. 107 | Your list of software and services, online |
| Register of confidentiality incidents | Act, s. 110 | Every incident is logged, serious or not |
| Ministry-recognized training at hiring, refreshed annually | Regulation, ss. 1–2 | Includes students, trainees and agency staff |
| Review of access to information at least once a year | Regulation, s. 7 | Review your EMR access logs |
| Calendar of end-of-life dates for technology products | Regulation, s. 15 | Know when your software or Windows version loses support |
| A designated person responsible for technology product security | Regulation, s. 16 | A name, not "the vendor handles it" |
If your information is communicated or hosted outside Quebec, the act also requires a prior assessment and a written agreement (s. 78), a mechanism similar to Law 25's.
Typical blind spots in a clinic
Clinics face constraints ordinary offices don't: staff moving between rooms, patients in the waiting area and specialized equipment. The same weaknesses keep showing up:
- The shared front-desk login. "reception1," known to everyone. It makes the logging the law requires almost useless, since nobody can tell who looked at what.
- PCs attached to medical devices. X-ray, ultrasound, ECG: these computers sometimes run old Windows versions managed by the device vendor, on the same network as everything else.
- Waiting-room Wi-Fi connected to the same network as the medical records.
- Unencrypted email used to send documents to patients, for lack of a secure portal.
- Cloud vendors whose hosting location and incident notification process nobody has checked.
Take a 15-person dental clinic in Sherbrooke. Its digital X-ray workstation ran an unsupported operating system on the same network as the front desk. The fix wasn't an overnight replacement: the workstation was moved to a separate network with no internet access until the replacement scheduled in the end-of-life calendar.
Priority measures
This is the checklist our team uses as a starting point with private clinics:
- Multi-factor authentication on email, the EMR and all remote access.
- A named account for every person, with fast automatic screen locking.
- Tested backups, including an offline or immutable copy (see our guide to the 3-2-1-1-0 backup rule).
- A separate network for medical devices and a separate guest network for the waiting room.
- Automatic updates on workstations; an end-of-life calendar kept current.
- EMR access logs turned on and reviewed at least once a year.
- An email domain protected with SPF, DKIM and DMARC to limit spoofing aimed at patients.
- Vendor contracts that specify hosting location, security measures and incident notification timelines.
- The technology product register published on your website.
- A downtime procedure: how to keep seeing patients when everything is offline.
When an incident happens
The day a workstation gets infected or a laptop is stolen, the law first asks you to take reasonable measures to reduce the risk of injury and prevent a repeat. Then, if the incident presents a risk of serious injury, you must promptly notify the Minister of Health and Social Services and the Commission d'accès à l'information, as well as the people concerned.
The assessment weighs the sensitivity of the information, the anticipated consequences and the likelihood of harmful use. With health information, sensitivity starts high. The reporting process is covered in our article on reporting a confidentiality incident to the CAI.
Our team can assess your clinic's security posture, check your registers and logs, and give you a prioritized plan through a cybersecurity audit. For questions about interpreting the act, your legal counsel and your professional order remain your best allies.
Frequently asked questions
Can a cloud-hosted electronic medical record be compliant?+
Yes, under certain conditions. The clinic must assess the product (a privacy impact assessment) before adopting it, bind the vendor with a contract that covers security measures and incident notification, and know where the data is hosted. If it leaves Quebec, the health information act requires an assessment that considers the destination's legal framework and a written agreement.
Do professional orders impose their own security rules?+
Yes. Professionals remain bound by professional secrecy and by their order's regulations, particularly on record keeping. Those requirements sit on top of the health information act and Law 25. Check with your professional order for the precise rules that apply to your profession.
What does a clinic risk if it fails to report a confidentiality incident?+
Under Quebec's health information act, failing to report an incident to the Minister or the Commission d'accès à l'information when required is an offence carrying a fine of $3,000 to $30,000 for an organization. Amounts double for a repeat offence. Communicating or using information without authorization carries heavier fines.
Sources
- 1.LégisQuébec: Act respecting health and social services information (R-22.1)
- 2.LégisQuébec: Regulation respecting the governance of health and social services information (R-22.1, r. 2)
- 3.Gouvernement du Québec: Entrée en vigueur de la Loi sur les renseignements de santé et de services sociaux
- 4.LégisQuébec: Act respecting the protection of personal information in the private sector (P-39.1)
- 5.Canadian Centre for Cyber Security: National Cyber Threat Assessment 2025-2026