Skip to content

Backups: Local NAS vs Cloud vs Immutable Storage vs Hybrid

On-site NAS, cloud backup, immutable storage or a hybrid 3-2-1-1-0 setup: ransomware resilience, restore speed, cost model and Canadian data residency compared.

Facts verified : October 2026This comparison is not sponsored.

Our recommendation for your situation

8-person Gatineau office, everything in Microsoft 365, no server

Cloud backup

With no local server, a NAS adds little. A cloud backup separate from Microsoft 365, with deletion protection and MFA on its admin account, covers the essentials.

40-person accounting firm in Montréal's West Island with a file server

Hybrid 3-2-1-1-0

The NAS quickly restores a deleted folder; the immutable cloud copy survives ransomware and disaster. Test restores regularly: the Canadian Centre for Cyber Security gives monthly testing as an example.

Business that already has a NAS and a cloud copy, both managed with the same credentials

Immutable storage

The biggest risk is one stolen account wiping out both copies. Turning on immutability for the cloud copy, with separate credentials and MFA, closes that door without starting over.

Side-by-side comparison

CriterionLocal NASCloud backupImmutable storageHybrid 3-2-1-1-0
Ransomware resilienceLow if the NAS is reachable with network accountsMedium: depends on protected versions and accessHigh during the retention periodHigh: at least one offline or immutable copy
Can be erased with a stolen admin accountYesYes, without deletion protectionBlocked during the retention periodBlocked for the immutable copy
Restore speedFast: the copy is on siteLimited by your internet connectionDepends on location: fast on site, limited by internet in the cloudFast for everyday incidents; cloud as a last resort
Off-site copy (fire, flood, theft)NoYesYes if it's in the cloud or at another siteYes
Cost modelDevice and drive purchase, then upkeepSubscription by volume or number of usersVolume kept until retention ends, with no early purgeLocal device plus cloud subscription
Data hosted in CanadaYes, on your premisesCheck: choose a Canadian regionDepends on the provider and region chosenLocal copy on your premises; cloud copy to check
Management effortHigh: updates, separate accounts, rotating offline copiesModerate: access, retention and alerts to monitorModerate: retention period to set in advanceHighest: two systems and regular tests
What the authorities sayUseful, never on its own: one copy must be off siteRecommended as a secondary backup (Canadian Centre for Cyber Security)Recommended by the NCSC for cloud backupsMatches the Canadian Centre's 3-2-1 rule, strengthened

The options in detail

Local NAS

Official site

A storage device on the office network that copies workstations and servers every night.

Best for
Fast, everyday restores: a deleted folder, a failed server.
Pricing
Purchase of the device and drives, then upkeep and eventual replacement

Strengths

  • Fast restores: the copy is on site
  • No dependence on your internet connection
  • Data stays on your premises

Limitations

  • The Canadian Centre for Cyber Security warns that ransomware can spread to a NAS
  • Lost along with the premises in a fire or flood
  • Often managed with the same accounts as the rest of the network

Cloud backup

Official site

An automatic copy of your data with a provider, away from your premises.

Best for
Businesses with no on-site server whose data already lives in Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace.
Pricing
Subscription based on storage volume or number of users

Strengths

  • Off-site copy with no handling
  • Automatic backups make a recent copy more likely
  • Infrastructure managed by the provider

Limitations

  • Restores are limited by your internet connection
  • The UK NCSC reports ransomware incidents that compromised connected cloud backups
  • Hosting region must be checked against your obligations

Immutable storage

Official site

A copy, in the cloud or on a dedicated device, that can't be changed or deleted during its retention period (object lock).

Best for
Adding a copy that even a stolen admin account can't erase.
Pricing
An option offered by many backup and storage services; you pay for the volume kept until retention ends

Strengths

  • Withstands backup deletion, ransomware's first target
  • Recommended by the UK NCSC for cloud backups
  • Can be added to an existing backup without starting over

Limitations

  • Retention period must be set in advance, with no going back
  • Replaces neither the local copy nor restore testing
  • CISA advises caution because it doesn't meet the compliance criteria of certain regulations

Hybrid 3-2-1-1-0

Official site

A local copy for speed, an off-site offline or immutable copy for survival, and restore tests with zero errors.

Best for
Any business with a server, or with data it can't afford to lose.
Pricing
Local device plus cloud subscription

Strengths

  • Fast everyday restores, plus a last-resort copy for ransomware or disaster
  • Applies and strengthens the Canadian Centre for Cyber Security's 3-2-1 rule
  • The Canadian Centre recommends a secondary cloud backup on top of offline copies

Limitations

  • Two systems to monitor
  • The combined cost of a device and a subscription
  • Requires regular, documented restore tests

Almost every small business has a backup. Far fewer have one that would survive ransomware. The Canadian Centre for Cyber Security puts it plainly: threat actors can attack NAS devices, and ransomware can spread to them. The UK NCSC adds that connected cloud backups have been compromised too.

So the real question isn't "NAS or cloud?" It's this: which copy will still be intact on the day an attacker holds your admin credentials? This comparison lines up four approaches, from the simplest to the most robust. For the rule itself, read our article on the 3-2-1-1-0 backup rule.

Our method

  • We compare approaches, not products. Every value in the table is based on publications from the Canadian Centre for Cyber Security, the UK NCSC, CISA and NIST, reviewed in October 2026.
  • Criteria: ransomware resilience, deletion with a stolen account, restore speed, off-site copy, cost, Canadian hosting, management effort and what the authorities recommend.
  • No prices are quoted: cost models are described qualitatively.
  • This comparison is not sponsored.

The NAS: fast, but within the attacker's reach

A NAS has one real advantage: speed. The Canadian Centre for Cyber Security notes that on-site storage is convenient, can save time and keeps backups readily available when you start a recovery. To restore a folder deleted by mistake or a failed server, nothing beats a copy on the local network.

Its two weaknesses are well known. First, it shares the fate of the building: a fire or flood takes out the original and the copy. Second, it's reachable from the network, often with the same admin accounts. An attacker who takes over the network finds the NAS and wipes it before launching encryption.

The cloud: off site, but not automatically safe

Cloud backup solves the disaster problem and the "someone forgot" problem: it's automatic and off site. The UK NCSC points out, however, that it needs a reliable internet connection both to back up and to restore. For a handful of files, that hardly matters; for a full server, the delay depends directly on data volume and your bandwidth.

On resilience, the cloud isn't magic. If an attacker can sign in to the console with a stolen account, they can delete the backups. The NCSC recommends checking that your cloud service protects previous versions from immediate deletion. Check the hosting region too: the Canadian Centre for Cyber Security reminds organizations that they remain legally responsible for their data, even with a provider.

Immutability: the copy nobody can erase

Immutable storage, sometimes called object lock, prevents a backup from being changed or deleted during its retention period. It's the first of the NCSC's principles for ransomware-resistant cloud backups. The NCSC also recommends alerts on mass deletions or changes to retention settings, and an out-of-band way back into the service.

The trade-off: retention is set in advance. CISA advises using immutable storage with caution, since it doesn't meet the compliance criteria of certain regulations. Align the retention period with your policy for keeping and destroying personal information.

Hybrid 3-2-1-1-0: speed and survival

The hybrid approach combines the strengths of the others. The local copy handles everyday incidents; the off-site, offline or immutable copy is there for the day everything else is compromised. It extends the Canadian Centre's 3-2-1 rule: three copies, on two types of media, one of them off site. The Centre's ransomware playbook also recommends at least two offline backups and a secondary backup in the cloud.

The last digit, zero errors, is the one most often forgotten. A backup that's never been restored is just an assumption.

How to choose

First, agree on two numbers with management: your recovery time objective (RTO), meaning how long you can operate without your systems, and your recovery point objective (RPO), meaning how many hours of work you can afford to lose. Then:

  • At least one copy is off site, and at least one is offline or immutable.
  • The backup admin account is separate from the network account and protected by MFA.
  • Backups are encrypted, and the key is stored elsewhere.
  • You know the hosting region, and a privacy impact assessment is done if it's outside Québec.
  • A full restore has been timed and compared with the RTO.

On the day of an attack, these choices carry a lot of weight: see our guide to the first 24 hours of a ransomware attack. If your data is mostly in Microsoft 365, find out whether you need a separate Microsoft 365 backup. Our remediation and hardening service reconfigures your backups and documents a test restore.

Frequently asked questions

Is OneDrive or Dropbox sync a backup?+

Not really. Sync replicates changes, including files encrypted by ransomware or deleted by mistake. The UK NCSC notes that ransomware incidents have compromised connected cloud storage containing backups. Version history offered by some services helps, but check how long versions are kept and who can delete them.

Does Québec's Law 25 require backups to stay in Québec?+

No. The law doesn't require hosting in Québec, but before personal information is communicated outside Québec, including to a provider that stores it for you, it requires a privacy impact assessment and a written agreement (s. 17). A cloud region in Ontario is therefore covered. Check your analysis with your legal counsel.

How long does a restore from the cloud take?+

It mostly depends on data volume and your internet connection: the UK NCSC points out that cloud backup needs a reliable connection both to back up and to restore. The only way to know your real figure is to time a full test restore, then compare it with your recovery time objective (RTO).

Should backups be encrypted?+

Yes. The Canadian Centre for Cyber Security's baseline controls call for backups to be stored in an encrypted state. Keep the key somewhere other than the backup itself: the UK NCSC suggests an out-of-band copy, such as a printed copy kept in a safe.

Sources

  1. 1.Canadian Centre for Cyber Security: Tips for backing up your information (ITSAP.40.002)
  2. 2.Canadian Centre for Cyber Security: Ransomware playbook (ITSM.00.099)
  3. 3.Canadian Centre for Cyber Security: Baseline cyber security controls for small and medium organizations
  4. 4.Canadian Centre for Cyber Security: Developing your IT recovery plan (ITSAP.40.004)
  5. 5.UK NCSC: Principles for ransomware-resistant cloud backups
  6. 6.UK NCSC: Offline backups in an online world
  7. 7.UK NCSC: Always back up your most important data
  8. 8.UK NCSC: Mitigating malware and ransomware attacks
  9. 9.CISA: #StopRansomware Guide
  10. 10.NIST: recovery time objective (RTO) definition, SP 800-34 Rev. 1
  11. 11.LégisQuébec: Act respecting the protection of personal information in the private sector (P-39.1), s. 17